Fontanella v. Fontanella

167 A.D.2d 185, 561 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered on or about July 25, 1989, which conditioned the denial of plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s testimony on defendant’s payment to plaintiffs counsel of $300 in attorney’s fees, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and as so modified, affirmed.

The court was within its discretion in conditioning the denial of plaintiffs motion to strike defendant’s testimony upon defendant’s payment of plaintiffs attorney’s fees. (CPLR 3126.) Those fees were necessitated solely by defendant’s failure to comply with the court’s earlier order which required that she serve and file an affidavit of net worth by March 17, 1989. However, the court abused its discretion by arbitrarily fixing the amount of the fees, and we accordingly remand so that fees may be fixed upon a proper showing of the value of the work necessitated and amount of time actually expended. Concur—Ross, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fontanella v. Fontanella, 167 A.D.2d 185, 561 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 185 (Fontanella v. Fontanella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danser v. Carrols Corp.
11 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Paull v. First UNUM Life Insurance
288 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Sage Realty Corp. v. Proskauer Rose L. L. P.
288 A.D.2d 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)