Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co.

83 F. 824, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2884

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 11, 1897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LAOOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to add anything was said in disposing of similar motions in Union Associated Press v. Times Printing Co., 83 Fed. 822, as the facts, except in one particular, are substantially the same. It appears, however, that there are debts due to defendant from solvent debtors residing in this state. This may fairly he held to be “property within this state,” within the meaning of section 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAOOMBE, Circuit Judge.

It seems unnecessary to add anything was said in disposing of similar motions in Union Associated Press v. Times Printing Co., 83 Fed. 822, as the facts, except in one particular, are substantially the same. It appears, however, that there are debts due to defendant from solvent debtors residing in this state. This may fairly he held to be “property within this state,” within the meaning of section 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion is therefore denied.

Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co., 83 F. 824, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2884 (circtsdny 1897).

Pincite

83 F. 824 (Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related