Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co.
This text of 83 F. 824 (Fontana v. Chronicle-Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems unnecessary to add anything was said in disposing of similar motions in Union Associated Press v. Times Printing Co., 83 Fed. 822, as the facts, except in one particular, are substantially the same. It appears, however, that there are debts due to defendant from solvent debtors residing in this state. This may fairly he held to be “property within this state,” within the meaning of section 432 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 F. 824, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontana-v-chronicle-telegraph-co-circtsdny-1897.