Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig

356 F.2d 472
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 10, 1966·No. 22402_1·Published

Opinion

356 F.2d 472

FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORP., Appellant,
v.
Florence Lustig CROSSMAN, a/k/a Florence Lustig trading and doing business as Florence Lustig, Appellee.

No. 22402.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

February 10, 1966.

Richard P. Kenney, Miami, Fla., Williams, Salomon & Kenney, Miami, Fla., for appellant.

Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., for appellee, Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel.

Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

It is the opinion of this Court that the judgment of the district court dismissing the proceedings before it was properly entered. That judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig, 356 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1966).

356 F.2d 472 (Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.