Fontaine v. Queens Supreme Court Judge Flug

New York Court of Appeals

Fontaine v. Queens Supreme Court Judge Flug

673 N.E.2d 1236, 88 N.Y.2d 1061, 651 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3330

DecidedOctober 22, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 673 N.E.2d 1236 (Fontaine v. Queens Supreme Court Judge Flug) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fontaine v. Queens Supreme Court Judge Flug, 673 N.E.2d 1236, 88 N.Y.2d 1061, 651 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3330 (N.Y. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as it is taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for an enlargement of time to perfect the proceeding, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeal, sua sponte, upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal, insofar as it is taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for an enlargement of time to perfect the proceeding, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeal, sua sponte, upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 N.E.2d 1236, 88 N.Y.2d 1061, 651 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 3330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontaine-v-queens-supreme-court-judge-flug-ny-1996.