Fontaine v. McNab

154 U.S. 652, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1092, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1543
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 29, 1880
DocketNo. 205
StatusPublished

This text of 154 U.S. 652 (Fontaine v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fontaine v. McNab, 154 U.S. 652, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1092, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1543 (1880).

Opinion

Mr. Ciitef Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

From the evidence in this ease we find:

1. That the trust deed from Flewellyn to Shorter was duly executed and delivered. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court of Georgia in Dinkins v. Moore, 17 Ga. 62, there was sufficient proof of delivery to authorize the record.

2. That the deed, when executed and delivered, had upon it internal revenue stamps to the amount of thirty dollars, which was all that was required.

3. That the deed, including the stamp, was properly recorded, March 15, 1867. And —

4. That at the time of the advertisement for sale under the trust deed there was no newspaper published in Quitman County, and that the Cuthbert Appeal had a general circulation in that county.

There is no dispute but that upon this state of facts the decree below must be affirmed, and it is consequently so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dinkins v. Moore
17 Ga. 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 U.S. 652, 14 S. Ct. 1201, 38 L. Ed. 1092, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fontaine-v-mcnab-scotus-1880.