Fontaine Davis v. City And County Of San Francisco

984 F.2d 345, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 916, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1842, 60 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,054, 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 457

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: February 5, 1993
• Docket: 91-15113
• Status: Published

Opinion

984 F.2d 345

61 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 457,
60 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,054, 61 USLW 2498

Fontaine DAVIS; Eric H. Washington; Jerilyn North, Jimmie
Braden, Audrey Lee, Early Davis, Brandi Swanson, Susan
Moorehead, Anne Young, Mary M. Carder, Theresa Rodigou,
Kathleen J. Bradshaw, Patricia Murray, International
Association of Black Firefighters-San Francisco Chapter, et
al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-15113.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1993.

Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND VACATING PORTION OF OPINION

Prior report: 9th Cir., 976 F.2d 1536.

ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellees' petition for rehearing is denied.

However, in light of the parties' settlement of plaintiff-appellees' claims to expert witness fees while the court had under consideration whether to take en banc the issue of retroactivity of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 which amended 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) to provide explicitly for the award of expert fees as part of costs, we vacate as moot that portion of the opinion that affirms the district court's award of expert witness fees in this case.

Upon remand to the district court, we direct that, as part of the remand, it vacate that portion of its judgment that awarded expert witness fees. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).