Fonseca v. University Medical Center

District Court, W.D. Texas·Decided August 20, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00180·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION

TIMOTHY A. FONSECA, § Plaintiff, § § No. 3:20-CV-180-FM-RFC v. § § UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., § Defendants. §

ORDER FOR SPECIAL REPORT On this day, the Court considered the status of the above-styled and numbered cause. On June 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed an “Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” (ECF No. 1.) On August 10, 2020, this Court granted (ECF No. 2) Plaintiff’s Application and his Complaint was thereafter filed. (ECF No. 3.) In the Order, the Court noted that “[p]rior to ordering service of process on Defendants, the Court [would] engage in judicial screening of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.” (ECF No. 2:3-4.) The Court finds that it is necessary to develop the known facts in the instant case to determine whether Plaintiff’s claims have potential merit or should be dismissed as frivolous or failing to state a claim. See Parker v. Carpenter, 978 F.2d 190, 191 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1992) (approving certain methods utilized by district courts to determine frivolousness of claims, including ordering prison officials to investigate the facts surrounding a claim in order to construct an administrative record). The Court further finds that requesting appropriate officials to provide the Court with records related to Plaintiff’s claims will enable the Court to determine whether Plaintiff is asserting meritorious claims within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. See Martinez v. Aaron, 570 F.2d 317, 319-20 (10th Cir. 1978), cited with approval in Parker v. Carpenter, 978 F.2d 190, 191 n. 2 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the El Paso County Sheriffs Office (“Sheriff's Office”) provide the Court with “certified copies of all of [Plaintiff's] medical records, including all sick call requests, and all of his written complaints and/or administrative grievance records,” in compliance with 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e), as described in United States v. Bek, 493 F.3d 790, 802 (7th Cir. 2007), from Plaintiff's time in the custody of the Sheriff’s Office from July 23, 2018, onwards. See Adams v. Edwards, No. CIV.A. 14-2649, 2015 WL 1517511, at *2 (E.D. La. Mar. 31, 2015). It is FURTHERED ORDERED that the Sheriff's Office prepare a report on the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs allegations pursuant to Martinez v. Aaron, 570 F.2d 317, 319 (10th Cir. 1987). The above materials shall be submitted to the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. It is FINALLY ORDERED that the District Clerk SEND a copy of this Order and Plaintiff's Complaint to the Sheriff's Office HQ, Attn: Sheriff Richard Wiles, 3850 Justice, El Paso, TX 79938. SO ORDERED. SIGNED and ENTERED this 20th day of August, 2020. Lp ROBERT F. CASTANEDA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fonseca v. University Medical Center, (W.D. Tex. 2020).

Fonseca v. University Medical Center (Fonseca v. University Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. Aaron
570 F.2d 317 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
Spencer Charles Parker v. Don Carpenter, Sheriff
978 F.2d 190 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Bek
493 F.3d 790 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)