Fonseca v. State

1 So. 3d 325, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 324, 2009 WL 129380
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2009
Docket3D08-2940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 So. 3d 325 (Fonseca v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fonseca v. State, 1 So. 3d 325, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 324, 2009 WL 129380 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the postconviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), (D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the postconviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GELIN v. State
1 So. 3d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 325, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 324, 2009 WL 129380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fonseca-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.