Fong v. Dulles

Supreme Court

Fong v. Dulles

349 U.S. 941, 75 S. Ct. 870, 99 L. Ed. 1269, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 736

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 31, 1955·No. No. 663·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

On petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in accordance with the Govern[942] ment’s suggestion.

Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in accordance with the Govern[942] ment’s suggestion.

Joseph S. Hertogs for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.

Fong v. Dulles, 349 U.S. 941, 75 S. Ct. 870, 99 L. Ed. 1269, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 736 (1955).

Pincite

349 U.S. 941 (Fong v. Dulles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related