Fong Shee v. Cahill

94 F.2d 1013, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1938
DocketNo. 8672
StatusPublished

This text of 94 F.2d 1013 (Fong Shee v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fong Shee v. Cahill, 94 F.2d 1013, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574 (9th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F.2d 1013, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fong-shee-v-cahill-ca9-1938.