Fong Poy v. Federal Trade Commission

Ninth Circuit

Fong Poy v. Federal Trade Commission

124 F.2d 398, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1941

DocketNo. 9865

StatusPublished

This text of 124 F.2d 398 (Fong Poy v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fong Poy v. Federal Trade Commission, 124 F.2d 398, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509 (9th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The default of petitioners in depositing the estimated expense of printing the transcript of record herein having been noted, and petitioners having indicated by letter that the petition to review herein has been abandoned, it is ordered, pursuant to provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), that a decree' of this Court be filed and entered herein affirming the order of the Federal Trade Commission, and commanding obedience to the terms of such order of said Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The default of petitioners in depositing the estimated expense of printing the transcript of record herein having been noted, and petitioners having indicated by letter that the petition to review herein has been abandoned, it is ordered, pursuant to provisions of 15 U.S.C.A. § 45(c), that a decree' of this Court be filed and entered herein affirming the order of the Federal Trade Commission, and commanding obedience to the terms of such order of said Commission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 F.2d 398, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fong-poy-v-federal-trade-commission-ca9-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack