Fong Ming v. Fong Ling

109 N.Y.S. 750
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 10, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.Y.S. 750 (Fong Ming v. Fong Ling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fong Ming v. Fong Ling, 109 N.Y.S. 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is taken from a judgment entered against the defendant upon his default. An appeal will not lie in such a case. Benvenuta v. Candeloro, 43 Misc. Rep. 684, 88 N. Y. Supp. 357. The remedy of the defendant is to move to open his default.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benvenuta v. Candeloro
43 Misc. 684 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.Y.S. 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fong-ming-v-fong-ling-nyappterm-1908.