Fong Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Fong Bros. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 252

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 1955

DocketNo. 58658; protests 200912-K and 205559-K (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 252 (Fong Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fong Bros. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 252 (cusc 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified by the Gen- ' eral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified by the Gen- ' eral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Cust. Ct. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fong-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1955.