Foner v. Joseph

Missouri Court of Appeals

Foner v. Joseph

210 S.W.3d 414, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1745, 2006 WL 3361180

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. ED 86335·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold Joseph appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of marriage in which it awarded Barbara Foner sole legal and physical custody of Joseph and Foner’s daughter, classified and divided property, and determined child support. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. We sustain Joseph’s motion to strike Foner’s submission of trial exhibits and sustain Foner’s motion to strike Joseph’s exhibits. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Harold Joseph appeals the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of marriage in which it awarded Barbara Foner sole legal and physical custody of Joseph and Foner’s daughter, classified and divided property, and determined child support. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. We sustain Joseph’s motion to strike Foner’s submission of trial exhibits and sustain Foner’s motion to strike Joseph’s exhibits. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Foner v. Joseph, 210 S.W.3d 414, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1745, 2006 WL 3361180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

210 S.W.3d 414 (Foner v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.