Fondeville & Co. v. United States
This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 466 (Fondeville & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items appearing on schedule B, attached to and made a part of the decision in this ease, consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) As to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to May 28, 1950 (protest 186453-K), at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) as to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption subsequent to May 28, 1950 (protests 182963-K, 194089-K, 192014-K, and 196918-K), at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547 (a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Cust. Ct. 466, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fondeville-co-v-united-states-cusc-1953.