Fondessy v. Simon

Ohio Supreme Court

Fondessy v. Simon

998 N.E.2d 509, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1409

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 2013·No. 2013-1574·Published

Opinion

Ottawa App. No. OT-11-041, 2013-Ohio-3465. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ entry filed September 20, 2013:

“Whether R.C. 2903.211(A)(1) requires a victim to actually experience mental distress or only believe that the stalker will cause the victim physical harm or mental distress, for a court to issue a civil stalking protection order.”

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Caban v. Ransome, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 08 MA 36, 2009-Ohio-1034.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ottawa App. No. OT-11-041, 2013-Ohio-3465. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ entry filed September 20, 2013:

“Whether R.C. 2903.211(A)(1) requires a victim to actually experience mental distress or only believe that the stalker will cause the victim physical harm or mental distress, for a court to issue a civil stalking protection order.”

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Caban v. Ransome, 7th Dist. Mahoning No. 08 MA 36, 2009-Ohio-1034.

Fondessy v. Simon, 998 N.E.2d 509, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1409 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

998 N.E.2d 509 (Fondessy v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related