Fondechene v. Waik Yu

254 A.D.2d 391, 678 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11121

This text of 254 A.D.2d 391 (Fondechene v. Waik Yu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fondechene v. Waik Yu, 254 A.D.2d 391, 678 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Kort Chevrolet appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated March 25, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that questions of fact exist which preclude summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 391, 678 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fondechene-v-waik-yu-nyappdiv-1998.