Fonda v. Broom
This text of 12 La. Ann. 768 (Fonda v. Broom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
So far as the defendant Hennen is personally concerned, this must be regarded as an action in damages against him for wilfully aiding Geo. L. Broom, as executor of the will of Samuel Broom, to waste the estate and defraud the heirs and creditors.
Under such allegations as those made in the petition, and the separate answer of Hennen, there was no error in permitting a severance or a trial by jury as to Hennen, who is the only appellee. The discretion of the District Judge in this matter was not restrained by any arbitrary rule in the Code of Practice.
An examination of the record has not enabled us to say, that the jury and the court below erred in concluding that the charges of fraud and mal-practice against the appellee were insufficiently proven.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 La. Ann. 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fonda-v-broom-la-1857.