Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.
114 F.3d 355, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1893, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850
Opinion
114 F.3d 355w
1997 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,642, 37 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1222
FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant,
Laurence Shiff, Appellant,
v.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick,
Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
No. 837, Docket 95-7847.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 30, 1997.
Decided May 22, 1997.
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc., 114 F.3d 355, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1893, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850 (2d Cir. 1997).
114 F.3d 355 (Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ted Lapidus v. Vann
112 F.3d 91 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Ted Lapidus, S.A. v. Vann
112 F.3d 91 (Second Circuit, 1997)