Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.

114 F.3d 355, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1893, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1997
Docket837
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 F.3d 355 (Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc., 114 F.3d 355, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1893, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850 (2d Cir. 1997).

Opinion

114 F.3d 355w

1997 Copr.L.Dec. P 27,642, 37 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1222

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant,
Laurence Shiff, Appellant,
v.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick,
Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.

No. 837, Docket 95-7847.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 30, 1997.
Decided May 22, 1997.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ted Lapidus v. Vann
112 F.3d 91 (Second Circuit, 1997)
Ted Lapidus, S.A. v. Vann
112 F.3d 91 (Second Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 F.3d 355, 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1222, 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1893, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fonar-corporation-v-magnetic-resonance-plus-inc-ca2-1997.