Fomuso v. Ashcroft
This text of Fomuso v. Ashcroft (Fomuso v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2123
ELVIRA BOH FOMUSO,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A76-911-120)
Submitted: April 19, 2004 Decided: April 29, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Byron R. Mobley, WALKER, BROWN AND BROWN, P.A., Hernando, Mississippi, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, William C. Minick, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Elvira Boh Fomuso, a native and citizen of Cameroon,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her
applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have
reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Fomuso, No.
A76-911-120 (B.I.A. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fomuso v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fomuso-v-ashcroft-ca4-2004.