Fomuso v. Ashcroft

Fourth Circuit

Fomuso v. Ashcroft

95 F. App'x 523

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 29, 2004·No. No. 03-2123·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elvira Boh Fomuso, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Fomuso, No. A76-911-120 (B.I.A. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Elvira Boh Fomuso, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Fomuso, No. A76-911-120 (B.I.A. Aug. 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Fomuso v. Ashcroft, 95 F. App'x 523 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

95 F. App'x 523 (Fomuso v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.