Folwell v. Folwell

63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 727, 1 Robb. 727, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 221
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 30, 1904·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed.

For affirmance — Dixon, Garrison, Port, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Veedenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray — 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Folwell v. Folwell, 63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 727, 1 Robb. 727, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 221 (N.J. 1904).

63 A. 1118 (Folwell v. Folwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.