Folwell v. Folwell
63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 727, 1 Robb. 727, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 221
This text of 63 A. 1118 (Folwell v. Folwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Folwell v. Folwell, 63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 727, 1 Robb. 727, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 221 (N.J. 1904).
Opinion
The decree of the court of chancery is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed.
For affirmance — Dixon, Garrison, Port, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Veedenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray — 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 A. 1118, 67 N.J. Eq. 727, 1 Robb. 727, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folwell-v-folwell-nj-1904.