Foltz v. Golden Age Nursing Home

1990 OK 61, 797 P.2d 334, 1990 Okla. LEXIS 156, 1990 WL 94165
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 10, 1990·No. No. 72573·Published

Opinion

ORDER OF SUMMARY DISPOSITION

THE COURT FINDS, from a review of the records and briefs submitted, that the recent decision in Scrappers, Inc. v. Wilson, 790 P.2d 1116 (Okla.1990), is disposi-[335] tive of the issue presented in the present case.

Rule 1.201 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases provides that “[i]n any case in which it appears that a prior controlling appellate decision is dispositive of the appeal, the court may summarily affirm or reverse, citing in its order of summary disposition this rule and the controlling decision.” Okl.Stat. tit. 12, chap. 15, app. 2 (Supp.1988).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Court of Appeals’ opinion is vacated and the Workers’ Compensation Court’s en banc Order on appeal filed January 26, 1989, is reinstated.

(s) Rudolph Hargrave CHIEF JUSTICE

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foltz v. Golden Age Nursing Home, 1990 OK 61, 797 P.2d 334, 1990 Okla. LEXIS 156, 1990 WL 94165 (Okla. 1990).

1990 OK 61 (Foltz v. Golden Age Nursing Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scrappers, Inc. v. Wilson
1990 OK 42 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)