Foltis v. Conmar Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Foltis v. Conmar Products Corp.

2 A.D.2d 880, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4026

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 880 (Foltis v. Conmar Products Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foltis v. Conmar Products Corp., 2 A.D.2d 880, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4026 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate items 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial unanimously affirmed. Order granting defendant’s motion for a further examination of plaintiff upon two items and a discovery and inspection on four items, unanimously modified by reinstating items (b)(1), (c)(1), (e)(2), (c)(3), (e)(4), (e)(5) and (e)(6) as set forth in the notice of motion of defendant, Conmar Products Corporation. With respect to plaintiff’s cross notice of motion, items 14 to 17a inclusive, relating to examination before trial, and items 2 to 7 inclusive, relating to discovery and inspection are eliminated, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendant. On the record before us the relief now granted is warranted. The date for the examinations to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur—• Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Prank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting defendant’s motion to vacate items 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial unanimously affirmed. Order granting defendant’s motion for a further examination of plaintiff upon two items and a discovery and inspection on four items, unanimously modified by reinstating items (b)(1), (c)(1), (e)(2), (c)(3), (e)(4), (e)(5) and (e)(6) as set forth in the notice of motion of defendant, Conmar Products Corporation. With respect to plaintiff’s cross notice of motion, items 14 to 17a inclusive, relating to examination before trial, and items 2 to 7 inclusive, relating to discovery and inspection are eliminated, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendant. On the record before us the relief now granted is warranted. The date for the examinations to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur—• Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Prank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 880, 156 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foltis-v-conmar-products-corp-nyappdiv-1956.