Folsom v. Winters

City of New York Municipal Court

Folsom v. Winters

35 Misc. 855, 72 N.Y.S. 1103

DecidedJune 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 855 (Folsom v. Winters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Folsom v. Winters, 35 Misc. 855, 72 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Hascall, J.

We think that no error was committed by the court below that calls for a reversal of the judgment appealed from. The papers excluded did not tend to prove agency and [856]*856none was established. Most of plaintiffs objections and exceptions are entirely without, grounds assigned therefor and cannot be considered by us upon appeal, while the others cannot avail as against the inherent weakness of appellant’s case.;

Judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hascall, J.

We think that no error was committed by the court below that calls for a reversal of the judgment appealed from. The papers excluded did not tend to prove agency and [856]*856none was established. Most of plaintiffs objections and exceptions are entirely without, grounds assigned therefor and cannot be considered by us upon appeal, while the others cannot avail as against the inherent weakness of appellant’s case.;

Judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 855, 72 N.Y.S. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folsom-v-winters-nynyccityct-1901.