Folsom v. State

638 So. 2d 54, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 914, 1994 WL 245652
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 9, 1994·No. No. 82289·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review State v. Folsom, 630 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), which certified for review questions essentially the same as those answered in Veilleux v. State, 635 So.2d 977 (Fla.1994), and Carino v. State, 635 So.2d 9 (Fla.1994). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The decision below is approved on the authority of Veilleux and Carino. The fourth issue raised by the State is moot and will not be addressed here.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., and McDONALD, Senior Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Folsom v. State, 638 So. 2d 54, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 311, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 914, 1994 WL 245652 (Fla. 1994).

638 So. 2d 54 (Folsom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Folsom
630 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Carino v. State
635 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Veilleux v. State
635 So. 2d 977 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)