Folsom v. Folsom

34 A. 743, 68 N.H. 310
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 34 A. 743 (Folsom v. Folsom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Folsom v. Folsom, 34 A. 743, 68 N.H. 310 (N.H. 1895).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The owner of a homestead right cannot convey or incumber it during the lifetime of his wife without her consent, or the approval of the judge of probate if she is not of *311 sound mind. She is entitled to occupy it during her life. P. S., e. 138, ss. 2, 4. A voluntary separation does not deprive her of the right to occupy it. Meader v. Place, 43 N. H. 307. It may be as important for her protection against her husband and those claiming under him, as for her protection against his creditors, that the homestead right be set off by metes and bounds (Atkinson v. Atkinson, 40 N. H. 249, 251), especially if the estate in which it exists is of greater value than $500; and hence the statute expressly provides that it may be set off on her petition. P. S., c. 138, s. 16.

Case discharged. Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kevin W. Hopkins
D. New Hampshire, 2021
Bremseth v. Olson
112 N.W. 1056 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A. 743, 68 N.H. 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folsom-v-folsom-nh-1895.