Folsom v. First Natl. Bank Og Graceville

Supreme Court of Florida

Folsom v. First Natl. Bank Og Graceville

121 So. 559, 97 Fla. 425

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 1, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *426 decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and. the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of the Opinion in the case of Roberts as Tax Collector, v. American National Bank of Pensacola filed during the present Term of the Court.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the *426 decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and. the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of the Opinion in the case of Roberts as Tax Collector, v. American National Bank of Pensacola filed during the present Term of the Court.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Folsom v. First Natl. Bank Og Graceville, 121 So. 559, 97 Fla. 425 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 559 (Folsom v. First Natl. Bank Og Graceville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.