Folsom v. Blood

53 N.H. 434
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 N.H. 434 (Folsom v. Blood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Folsom v. Blood, 53 N.H. 434 (N.H. 1873).

Opinion

Foster, J.

The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any state shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, as the case may be, that said attestation is in due form.” 1 U. S. Stat. 122; Brightley’s Dig. 265, sec. 9.

The certificate of such judge or magistrate, being the evidence prescribed by law that due form has been observed in the attestation, is at once indispensable and conclusive. Ferguson v. Harwood, 7 Cranch. 408 ; Tooker v. Thompson, 3 McLean 93; Taylor v. Carpenter, 2 W. & M. 4; Steere v. Tenney, 50 N. H. 461; Hutchins v. Gerrish, 52 N. H. 205.

The record offered in evidence was clearly inadmissible for want of such certificate, and therefore, by the provisions of the case, the pláintiff must become • Nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cogliano
777 A.2d 867 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 N.H. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folsom-v-blood-nh-1873.