Folsom v. Barnett ex rel. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Folsom v. Barnett ex rel. Barnett

306 S.W.2d 832

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedNovember 1, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 306 S.W.2d 832 (Folsom v. Barnett ex rel. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Folsom v. Barnett ex rel. Barnett, 306 S.W.2d 832 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert H. Folsom, defendant below, has moved for an appeal from a judgment of the Mercer Circuit Court by which appel-lee was awarded damages in the sum of $500 for injury to a thoroughbred colt which resulted in its destruction. The injury was alleged to have resulted from malpractice on the part of appellant, a veterinarian.

An examination of the record has revealed that sufficient evidence was produced to put in issue the question of whether appellant used such skill and attention as may ordinarily be expected of careful and skillful persons in his profession.

The issue was correctly submitted to a jury.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI