Folse v. Bahry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Folse v. Bahry

83 So. 2d 914, 1955 La. App. LEXIS 1035

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 22, 1955·No. No. 4079·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

As found in the companion suit of Bahry v. Folse, reported above at La.App., 83 So.2d 912, Bahry’s negligent entry onto the main thoroughfare was the sole proximate cause of the accident. The evidence reveals no dispute as to the cost of repairs to the Folse vehicle occasioned by the accident being in the amount of $460.38, the amount awarded herein by the District Court to Folse. This is a proper measure of recovery. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court herein in favor of plaintiff Folse in this amount is hereby affirmed. Cost of this appeal to be paid by defendants-appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TATE, Judge.

As found in the companion suit of Bahry v. Folse, reported above at La.App., 83 So.2d 912, Bahry’s negligent entry onto the main thoroughfare was the sole proximate cause of the accident. The evidence reveals no dispute as to the cost of repairs to the Folse vehicle occasioned by the accident being in the amount of $460.38, the amount awarded herein by the District Court to Folse. This is a proper measure of recovery. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court herein in favor of plaintiff Folse in this amount is hereby affirmed. Cost of this appeal to be paid by defendants-appellants.

Folse v. Bahry, 83 So. 2d 914, 1955 La. App. LEXIS 1035 (La. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

83 So. 2d 914 (Folse v. Bahry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related