Folse v. Asbell
This text of 485 S.E.2d 32 (Folse v. Asbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At issue in this case is title to land. The trial court granted Max Asbell’s motion for summary judgment and enjoined Carrol Folse from maintaining a fence on Asbell’s land. We affirm.
Folse and Asbell own adjoining lots in Houston County. Folse has owned his lot since 1969 and has maintained several fences along its southern boundary. Asbell acquired his lot just to the south of Folse’s in 1994. The parties agree that Folse’s current fence encroaches on Asbell’s land.
Folse claims no written evidence of title to any portion of Asbell’s land. Therefore, he has not acquired title by adverse possession under OCGA § 44-5-164. Nor has Folse held the land under a claim of right sufficient to put anyone on notice of an adverse claim. Therefore, he has not acquired title under OCGA § 44-5-163. Finally, there is no evidence that the boundary line between the lots was ever unascertained or in dispute. Therefore, Folse has not acquired title by acquiescence under OCGA § 44-4-6. We conclude that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment to Asbell.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 S.E.2d 32, 267 Ga. 489, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 363, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folse-v-asbell-ga-1997.