Folmar v. Davis

108 So. 2d 772
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1959
Docket58-266
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 108 So. 2d 772 (Folmar v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Folmar v. Davis, 108 So. 2d 772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

108 So.2d 772 (1959)

Oliver W. FOLMAR, Appellant,
v.
Olivia Anderson DAVIS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph A. Anderson, deceased, Appellee.

No. 58-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

February 10, 1959.

Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, for appellant.

Smathers, Thompson & Dyer and Douglas D. Batchelor, Miami, for appellee.

PEARSON, Judge.

The issue tried in this cause was the amount of compensation to which the appellant was entitled. He had been replaced, as an attorney, in certain litigation in which he represented one Joseph Anderson, now deceased. The error assigned was that the court erred in finding the amount it awarded as reasonable attorney's fees. A review of the evidence before the trial judge reveals that several expert witnesses testified that the appellant was entitled to a fee much larger in amount than that awarded and only one testified to a smaller amount. No witness testified to the exact amount found by the court.

The determination of the amount of the recovery was largely in the discretion of the trier of facts taking into consideration the service performed, the responsibility incurred, the nature of the service, the skill and time required, the circumstances under which it was rendered, the customary charges for like service, the amount involved, and the importance and results of the litigation. Also in estimating the value of an attorney's services his skill, experience, professional reputation, and even his amount of business may be taken into consideration. The testimony of expert witnesses is to aid and assist in the determination, but such testimony is neither conclusive nor binding on the court or the jury. See Munroe v. Birdsey, 102 Fla. 544, 136 So. 886; Baruch v. Giblin, 122 Fla. 59, 164 So. 831; Powell v. Cocowitch, Fla. 1957, 94 So.2d 589.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and BARNS, PAULD., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunn v. Sentry Ins.
462 So. 2d 107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Marchion Terrazzo, Inc. v. Altman
372 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
In Re Estate of Ryecheck
323 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
DIVISION OF AD., ST. DEPT. OF TRANS. v. Condominium Int.
317 So. 2d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Dade County v. Oolite Rock Company
311 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Behm v. Division of Admin., State, Dept. of Transp.
292 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
First National Bank v. Balmar Corp.
40 Fla. Supp. 61 (Palm Beach County Circuit Court, 1974)
Palm Beach County v. Inlet Bay Club, Inc.
40 Fla. Supp. 78 (Palm Beach County Circuit Court, 1973)
Fatolitis v. Fatolitis
271 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Ettinger v. Ettinger
257 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
City of Miami Beach v. Manilow
253 So. 2d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Canal Authority v. Ocala Manufacturing Ice and Packing Company
253 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Bollenbach v. Bollenbach
175 N.W.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1970)
City of Miami Beach v. Cummings
228 So. 2d 109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Solar Research Corporation v. Parker
221 So. 2d 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Florida Bar v. Rose
187 So. 2d 329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Blum v. Blum
180 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
City of Miami Beach v. Belle Isle Apartment Corp.
177 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Ronlee, Inc. v. PM Walker Co.
129 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Raynes v. Raynes
128 So. 2d 417 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 2d 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folmar-v-davis-fladistctapp-1959.