Follum v. United States
This text of Follum v. United States (Follum v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1569
WARREN R. FOLLUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-818-5-BO(3))
Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 7, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren R. Follum, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Raleigh Ellisen, Sara Ann Ketchum, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Warren R. Follum appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing his
complaint in which he sought to enjoin the Internal Revenue Service
from proceeding on a tax levy pending completion of his
administrative appeal from the imposition of a tax lien. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Follum v.
United States, No. CA-02-818-5-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Follum v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/follum-v-united-states-ca4-2003.