Follis v. Proctor & Gamble

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Follis v. Proctor & Gamble

5 Ky. Op. 649, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 545

DecidedSeptember 19, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 649 (Follis v. Proctor & Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Follis v. Proctor & Gamble, 5 Ky. Op. 649, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 545 (Ky. Ct. App. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The appellants were sued in the Campbell Circuit Court by the appellees on a judgment obtained by appellees against them before a justice of the peace in the state of Ohio. They allege in their petition the obtention of the judgment and the amount they are entitled to recover.

The appellants were duly served with process and a judgment by default rendered against them. Their failure to answer was an admission of the allegations: that such a judgment was rendered and cured the defect, if any, in the record filed with the petition.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The appellants were sued in the Campbell Circuit Court by the appellees on a judgment obtained by appellees against them before a justice of the peace in the state of Ohio. They allege in their petition the obtention of the judgment and the amount they are entitled to recover.

The appellants were duly served with process and a judgment by default rendered against them. Their failure to answer was an admission of the allegations: that such a judgment was rendered and cured the defect, if any, in the record filed with the petition.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ky. Op. 649, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/follis-v-proctor-gamble-kyctapp-1871.