Folley v. Foley

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

DEREK FOLLEY,

Petitioner, : Case No. 3:22-cv-065

- vs - District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden,

: Respondent. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by Petitioner Derek Folley under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court on Folley’s Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing on his Speedy Trial claim (ECF No. 94). The Motion is denied on the authority of Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011), and Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez, 596 U.S. ___, 142 S.Ct. 1718 (2022).

July 15, 2022. s/ Michael R. Merz United States Magistrate Judge