Follendore v. Follendore

24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 71
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 407 (Follendore v. Follendore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Follendore v. Follendore, 24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 71 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Though the defendant in an action ex delicto, brought in a justice’s court, may plead as a set-off a demand against the plaintiff arising ex contractu, where the latter is insolvent and unable to respond and the collection of the defendant’s claim would otherwise be hazarded, yet, if the alleged insolvency is not proved, the plaintiff, upon making out his case, is entitled to recover, although he may admit the correctness and justness of the defendant’s counter-claim. This follows from the general rule that a claim arising ex contractu cannot be set off againsit a claim arising ex delicto, except for special equitable reasons which must be made to appear.

2. In the present case there was no evidence of the insolvency of the plaintiff; and therefore the court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hecht v. Snook & Austin Furniture Co.
41 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/follendore-v-follendore-ga-1896.