Folland v. Frenette

Superior Court of Maine·Decided January 5, 2004·No. YORap-03-050·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT / CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. AP-03-050

Coke ME Oe Ee 2oe'! mY OF VD ere a i

STEPHEN FOLLAND and CINDY FOLLAN D, Plaintiffs Te nn ncn tt ce ae eee ee _ DONALD L. : oe Vv. ORDER Ley og PHILIP FRENETTE, VAN 30 2004 Defendant

This appeal from a Small Claims judgment in favor of the Follands was heard on December 30, 2003. The appeal is Denied.

The complaint seeks recovery of an earnest money deposit after a proposed real estate sale failed to be completed. The case was heard in the District Court, which awarded judgment in the sum of $2,000.00, plus costs to the Follands. As the appellant, Mr. Frenette has the obligation to provide the Superior Court with a record suitable for effective appellate review. In this case there is no transcript or statement of findings.

Therefore, the appeal must fail. Boothbay Register, Inc. v. Murphy, 415 A.2d 1079 (Me.

1980). Dated: January 5, 2004 STEPHEN & CINDY FOLLAND - PLS (pro se) C]. . MICHAEL J. O'TOOLE, ESQ. - DEF G/ Arthut Brennan

Justice, Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Folland v. Frenette, (Me. Super. Ct. 2004).

Folland v. Frenette (Folland v. Frenette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boothbay Register, Inc. v. Murphy
415 A.2d 1079 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)