Folland v. Frenette
This text of Folland v. Frenette (Folland v. Frenette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT / CIVIL ACTION YORK, ss. DOCKET NO. AP-03-050
Coke ME Oe Ee 2oe'! mY OF VD ere a i
STEPHEN FOLLAND and CINDY FOLLAN D, Plaintiffs Te nn ncn tt ce ae eee ee _ DONALD L. : oe Vv. ORDER Ley og PHILIP FRENETTE, VAN 30 2004 Defendant
This appeal from a Small Claims judgment in favor of the Follands was heard on December 30, 2003. The appeal is Denied.
The complaint seeks recovery of an earnest money deposit after a proposed real estate sale failed to be completed. The case was heard in the District Court, which awarded judgment in the sum of $2,000.00, plus costs to the Follands. As the appellant, Mr. Frenette has the obligation to provide the Superior Court with a record suitable for effective appellate review. In this case there is no transcript or statement of findings.
Therefore, the appeal must fail. Boothbay Register, Inc. v. Murphy, 415 A.2d 1079 (Me.
1980). Dated: January 5, 2004 STEPHEN & CINDY FOLLAND - PLS (pro se) C]. . MICHAEL J. O'TOOLE, ESQ. - DEF G/ Arthut Brennan
Justice, Superior Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Folland v. Frenette, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folland-v-frenette-mesuperct-2004.