Folk v. State Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n

63 A. 1013, 214 Pa. 529, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 695
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 19, 1906
DocketAppeal, No. 34
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 63 A. 1013 (Folk v. State Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Folk v. State Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n, 63 A. 1013, 214 Pa. 529, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 695 (Pa. 1906).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

The general purpose of building associations is the accumulation of funds to be loaned to their members and to be repaid in [544]*544small periodical payments. The accumulation from tbe payment of installments on stock is so slow as often to hamper their practical operations and different methods have been adopted to provide funds to meet the demands of borrowing members promptly and thus to promote the general purpose. Building associations are authorized by the Act of June 25, 1895, P. L. 303, to borrow money for temporary use when applications for loans exceed the accumulations in the treasury, and when a series of stock has matured. The issuing by these associations of full paid stock to serve the same purpose as borrowing is an enlargement of their scope of operations not inconsistent with their original design, if properly restricted. While it has not been expressly authorized by the legislature, there is a distinct recognition of the practice by the Act of June 22, 1897, P. L. 178, which subjects such stock to taxation. We find nothing unlawful in the issuing of full paid stock, the dividends of which are not guaranteed but are limited in amount and payable only out of- the profits, and the holders of which are entitled to no preference and have no advantage over other stockholders upon distribution in case of loss or insolvency; provided that the issue is incidental to the main business of the association and is intended to provide a fund from which loans may be made to the holders of installment stock. To this extent and for this purpose its issue is within the implied powers of such associations.

The reasons stated by the learned judge of the common pleas amply support the decree dismissing the bill, and upon them the decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blessing v. Granville Township School District
11 Pa. D. & C.2d 115 (Mifflin County Court of Common Pleas, 1957)
Fielis v. Henry H. Edmunds Building & Loan Ass'n
9 A.2d 906 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
1939 OK 295 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Philadelphia Investment Building & Loan Association's Petition
183 A. 93 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Gaynor v. Force Building & Loan Ass'n
22 Pa. D. & C. 328 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Lifter v. Ruth Gordon Building & Loan Ass'n
19 Pa. D. & C. 160 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)
Guaranty Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 754 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)
Weinroth v. Homer Building & Loan Ass'n
165 A. 28 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Schuster v. Largman
162 A. 305 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'n
153 A. 758 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Smith v. Bath Loan & Building Ass'n
136 A. 284 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)
Herold v. Park View Building & Loan Ass'n
210 F. 577 (Third Circuit, 1914)
Parkview Building & Loan Ass'n v. Herold
203 F. 876 (D. New Jersey, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A. 1013, 214 Pa. 529, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folk-v-state-capital-savings-loan-assn-pa-1906.