Folger v. Washburn

137 Mass. 60, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 181
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 10, 1884·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

In an action for malicious prosecution, the burden is upon the plaintiff to prove that the suit or prosecution complained of was instituted maliciously, and without probable cause. A general denial by the defendant puts in issue all the facts which it is necessary for the plaintiff to prove in order to make out a prima facie case. Evidence on behalf of the defendant, that, in instituting the previous prosecution, he acted in good faith, under the advice of counsel, is competent under a general denial, because it tends to rebut the plaintiff’s allegations of malice and want of probable cause. This is not a substantive fact in avoidance of the action; it does not admit and avoid facts alleged by the plaintiff, but disproves them. Brigham v. Aldrich, 105 Mass. 212. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Folger v. Washburn, 137 Mass. 60, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 181 (Mass. 1884).

137 Mass. 60 (Folger v. Washburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higgins v. Pratt
56 N.E.2d 595 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Gerbig v. Gerbig
128 P.2d 938 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1942)
Emler v. Fox
189 S.W. 469 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1916)
Black v. Buckingham
54 N.E. 494 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Kellogg v. Scheuerman
51 P. 344 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)