Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.

1998 Ohio 568, 83 Ohio St. 3d 149

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1998

Docket1998-0652

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 568 (Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 1998 Ohio 568, 83 Ohio St. 3d 149 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 149.]

FOLGER, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 1998-Ohio-568.] Appeals—Judgment reversed and cause remanded. (No. 98-652—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Greene County, No. 97-CA-48. __________________ Altick & Corwin Co., L.P.A., and Thomas M. Baggott, for appellant. Freund, Freeze & Arnold, L.P.A., and Gordon D. Arnold, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 695 N.E.2d 732. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 149.]

FOLGER, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Folger v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., 1998-Ohio-568.] Appeals—Judgment reversed and cause remanded. (No. 98-652—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided September 16, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Greene County, No. 97-CA-48. __________________ Altick & Corwin Co., L.P.A., and Thomas M. Baggott, for appellant. Freund, Freeze & Arnold, L.P.A., and Gordon D. Arnold, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 695 N.E.2d 732. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 568, 83 Ohio St. 3d 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folger-v-state-farm-mut-ins-co-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack