Foley v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Foley v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

92 N.Y.S. 781

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 781 (Foley v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foley v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n, 92 N.Y.S. 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

O’GORMAN, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case (90 N. Y. Supp. 406) we held that it was for the jury, to determine whether the invitation given by Walker was within the scope of his authority, expressly or by implication. Upon the second trial this question was properly submitted to the jury, and its finding for the plaintiff is amply supported by the evidence. There was no impropriety in the reference made by the trial justice to the pleadings. Pleadings in a case are before the court and jury, and may be read and commented upon for the purpose of defining the issue, and showing what part of the allegations is admitted, without having been formally put in evidence. Abb. Trial Brief, 301. In Holmes v. Jones, 121 N. Y. 466, 24 N. E. 702, the court said:

“Statements, admissions, and allegations in pleadings are always in evidence for all the purposes of the trial of the action. They are made for the purposes of the trial, and are before the court and jury, and may be used for any legitimate purpose.”

The jury could not have misapprehended the court’s instructions. The learned justice repeatedly impressed upon them that the plaintiff could not recover unless his allegations were clearly established by the evidence.

There is no merit in the exceptions, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’GORMAN, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case (90 N. Y. Supp. 406) we held that it was for the jury, to determine whether the invitation given by Walker was within the scope of his authority, expressly or by implication. Upon the second trial this question was properly submitted to the jury, and its finding for the plaintiff is amply supported by the evidence. There was no impropriety in the reference made by the trial justice to the pleadings. Pleadings in a case are before the court and jury, and may be read and commented upon for the purpose of defining the issue, and showing what part of the allegations is admitted, without having been formally put in evidence. Abb. Trial Brief, 301. In Holmes v. Jones, 121 N. Y. 466, 24 N. E. 702, the court said:

“Statements, admissions, and allegations in pleadings are always in evidence for all the purposes of the trial of the action. They are made for the purposes of the trial, and are before the court and jury, and may be used for any legitimate purpose.”

The jury could not have misapprehended the court’s instructions. The learned justice repeatedly impressed upon them that the plaintiff could not recover unless his allegations were clearly established by the evidence.

There is no merit in the exceptions, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-young-mens-christian-assn-nyappterm-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack