Foley v. Wyeth

84 Mass. 135
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1861
StatusPublished

This text of 84 Mass. 135 (Foley v. Wyeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foley v. Wyeth, 84 Mass. 135 (Mass. 1861).

Opinion

Merrick, J.

The plaintiff was tenant at will of the land described in his writ, and of the passage ways appurtenant thereto. Gould v. Thompson, 4 Met. 224. He was in possession as well of the ways as of the land to the full enjoyment of which they were indispensable; and therefore any unlawful act by which he is deprived of the use of the way is an injury for which he may maintain an action as well as if it had directly interfered with and disturbed him in the occupation of the land The ruling of the court having been otherwise was erroneous, and the exception taken to it by the defendant must be sustained. See Foley v. Wyeth, ante, 131.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Graddy
61 Ky. 223 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1863)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Mass. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-wyeth-mass-1861.