Foley v. Ulrich

236 A.2d 137, 50 N.J. 426, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedDecember 4, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 236 A.2d 137 (Foley v. Ulrich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foley v. Ulrich, 236 A.2d 137, 50 N.J. 426, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman —6.

For affirmance — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Debra Gottsleben v. Christopher Annese
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Stephanie Barbosa v. Sam J. Perez
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
23 A.3d 912 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
998 A.2d 506 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Hoagland v. Gomez
676 A.2d 187 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Chouinard v. NH SPEEDWAY
829 F. Supp. 495 (D. New Hampshire, 1993)
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
456 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Davis v. Pecorino
350 A.2d 51 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
O'NEILL v. Suburban Terrace Apartments, Inc.
266 A.2d 304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.2d 137, 50 N.J. 426, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-ulrich-nj-1967.