Foley v. Ulrich
236 A.2d 137, 50 N.J. 426, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 184
Opinion
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Francis, Proctor, Goldmann, Schettino and Haneman —6.
For affirmance — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foley v. Ulrich, 236 A.2d 137, 50 N.J. 426, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 184 (N.J. 1967).
236 A.2d 137 (Foley v. Ulrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Debra Gottsleben v. Christopher Annese
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Stephanie Barbosa v. Sam J. Perez
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Maria Guartan and Jose Guartan v. Ortani Place Condominium Association
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
JUAN NUNEZ VS. LOUIS GALLO (L-0217-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
23 A.3d 912 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Luchejko v. City of Hoboken
998 A.2d 506 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2010)
Hoagland v. Gomez
676 A.2d 187 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Chouinard v. NH SPEEDWAY
829 F. Supp. 495 (D. New Hampshire, 1993)
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
456 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Davis v. Pecorino
350 A.2d 51 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1975)
O'NEILL v. Suburban Terrace Apartments, Inc.
266 A.2d 304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)