Foley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Foley v. State

1926 OK CR 267, 246 P. 1117, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1926

DocketNo. A-5520.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 267 (Foley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foley v. State, 1926 OK CR 267, 246 P. 1117, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Greer county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to violate the law, and was sentenced to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100. The case was tried in December, 1924, and appeal was lodged in this court in April, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument made. An examination of the record discloses that the offense was properly charged, and that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment and sentence. No fundamental error requiring a reversal is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Greer county on a charge of having possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to violate the law, and was sentenced to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100. The case was tried in December, 1924, and appeal was lodged in this court in April, 1925. No briefs have been filed in support of the appeal, and no appearance for oral argument made. An examination of the record discloses that the offense was properly charged, and that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment and sentence. No fundamental error requiring a reversal is apparent. The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 267, 246 P. 1117, 34 Okla. Crim. 393, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.