Foley v. State
This text of 147 So. 3d 16 (Foley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted by a jury for burglary of a structure while armed, grand theft, theft of a firearm, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the State correctly concedes that it failed to provide sufficient evidence of the value of the stolen property to prove count II, grand theft. See Marrero v. State, 71 So.3d 881 (Fla.2011).
We affirm Appellant’s conviction on counts I, III, IV and V, but vacate the conviction and sentence under count II, grand theft, and remand to the circuit court for entry of a judgment and sentence for petit theft in the second degree.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 So. 3d 16, 2013 WL 1749481, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.