Foley v. State

937 So. 2d 235, 2006 WL 2521291
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2006
Docket3D06-1641
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 937 So. 2d 235 (Foley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foley v. State, 937 So. 2d 235, 2006 WL 2521291 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

937 So.2d 235 (2006)

Arthur W. FOLEY, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-1641.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 1, 2006.

Arthur W. Foley, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and SUAREZ, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

The appellant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the State did not file an amended information after orally amending the information. We affirm the trial court's denial of the 3.800 motion. See State v. Anderson, 537 So.2d 1373 (Fla.1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foley v. State
979 So. 2d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Roman v. State
937 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
937 So. 2d 235, 2006 WL 2521291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.