Foley v. State Department of Health

839 So. 2d 828, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2600, 2003 WL 728928
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2003
DocketNo. 4D01-3451
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 839 So. 2d 828 (Foley v. State Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foley v. State Department of Health, 839 So. 2d 828, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2600, 2003 WL 728928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

GRIMES, HUBERT L., Associate Judge.

We grant appellee’s unopposed Motion for Rehearing and Clarification, withdraw the previous opinion in this case and substitute the following:

The Florida Department of Health (“Department”) filed an administrative complaint against appellant to revoke his paramedic’s certificate. The certificate of service shows that the complaint was mailed to appellant, Robert W. Foley, and received by H.W. Foley on May 10, 2001. On June 7, 2001, the Department filed and served a Motion for Default because it did not receive appellant’s Election of Rights form in a timely fashion.

Appellant alleges that he served the Election of Rights reply upon the Department on June 6, 2001. He alleges that he checked off the box on the form indicating that he did not dispute the facts alleged in the original complaint but requested an evidentiary hearing to offer proof of mitigation. The attorney for the Department received the election after filing the Motion for Default and then agreed to withdraw the motion. However, the Secretary of the Department thereafter, sua sponte, entered a final order revoking Foley’s certificate without a hearing or notice because appellant did not timely file or serve his election of rights.

The Department confesses error in entering this order revoking appellant’s par[829]*829amedic certificate without a hearing. The Department acknowledges that it was equitably estopped from entering the order because the attorney for the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services advised appellant that his untimely “Election of Rights” form would be accepted and appellant detrimentally relied upon that representation and took no action subsequent to the filing of the election of rights form.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter with instructions to the Department to conduct a proceeding pursuant to section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes, on the administrative complaint and afford appellant an opportunity to present evidence in mitigation as requested.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riverwood Nursing Center, LLC v. Agency for Health Care Administration
58 So. 3d 907 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Patz v. Department of Health
864 So. 2d 79 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
839 So. 2d 828, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2600, 2003 WL 728928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-state-department-of-health-fladistctapp-2003.