Foley v. Shanahan

211 S.E.2d 367, 133 Ga. App. 262
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 7, 1974·No. 49852, 50036·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Clark, Judge.

1. Piece-meal review is not favored by the courts. "[I]n the absence of an express determination by the court that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for entry of judgment, no order or decision which adjudicates with respect to fewer than all the claims or all the parties is final or appealable. [Code Ann. § 81A-154 and cits.].

"Since there is no appeal from a final, appealable judgment in the record and no certificate for immediate review as provided for by Code Ann. § 6-701 (a, 2) this appeal must be dismissed under authority of the above cases.” Rodriguez v. Newby, 130 Ga. App. 139, 140 (202 SE2d 565).

2. In view of the dismissal of the main appeal, it is unnecessary to consider the cross appeal.

Appeals dismissed.

Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley v. Shanahan, 211 S.E.2d 367, 133 Ga. App. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

211 S.E.2d 367 (Foley v. Shanahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Noble
430 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Hartley v. Taylor
402 S.E.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Schenden
356 S.E.2d 761 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Mulligan v. Scott
217 S.E.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Flintwood, Inc. v. Johnson
213 S.E.2d 180 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)