Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.

126 A. 453, 100 N.J.L. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 N.J.L. 278
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 29, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of this court above set out.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzentsach, Campbell,. Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, Kays, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 126 A. 453, 100 N.J.L. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1924).

126 A. 453 (Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.