Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.
126 A. 453, 100 N.J.L. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 255
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 N.J.L. 278 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of this court above set out.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzentsach, Campbell,. Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co., 126 A. 453, 100 N.J.L. 398, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1924).
126 A. 453 (Foley v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.