Foley v. Hefferon
This text of 31 N.W. 877 (Foley v. Hefferon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action on a promissory note given for rent due under a lease of certain described real estate. A land'lord’s attachment was issued and certain projierty attached. William Hefferon intervened, and in a pleading filed by him asserted that he owned the attached property, and that the attachment thereof was, upon several stated grounds, invalid. The abstract contains the pleadings, and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and it is also stated that the court made certain rulings during the trial. But it is shown, by 'an amended abstract, that there is no bill of exceptions, and the correctness of the statements in the abstract is denied. The amended abstract, as there is no denial of its correctness must be deemed true. Therefore we cannot say that the court erred. This must affirmatively appear. • Aeeiemed. •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 N.W. 877, 70 Iowa 572, 1887 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foley-v-hefferon-iowa-1887.